23 hours ago
Sat Nov 15, 2025 3:25pm PST
Show HN: I Built the Anti-Social Network (and Social Media Billionaires Hate It)
I had 3,000 LinkedIn connections and felt completely alone. So I built something that will probably make me zero dollars: a social network that actively prevents you from building a following. Here's what makes this controversial:

Your connections literally expire after 48 hours (yes, really) Zero followers, zero likes, zero feed to doomscroll The algorithm tries its HARDEST to match you with someone NOT from your country No ads. No data mining. No engagement metrics to optimize for.

The nuclear take that will get me roasted: Social media isn't broken because of the algorithm. It's broken because we've gamified human connection. Every platform is optimizing for addiction and engagement, calling it "connection." They've convinced us that 3,000 shallow relationships > 3 deep ones. Eintercon does the opposite. It's anti-growth, anti-retention, anti-engagement. You get matched with ONE person abroad, 48 hours, then they're gone. No building empires. No personal brands. Just... talking to another human. What I'm asking HN:

Am I insane for building an app that intentionally limits growth? Is there even a business model for "authentic connection" when surveillance capitalism pays 100x more? Has anyone else felt completely alienated by having "thousands of connections"?

I know this will get comments saying "this already exists" (it doesn't, not like this) or "no business model = dead" (probably true). But I'm curious if anyone else feels like social media made us less social, not more. Try it: eintercon.com Roast me. Or tell me I'm onto something. Either way, I need to know if this resonates or if I've completely lost the plot.

read article
comments:
add comment
loading comments...